The fallout from the recent bank failures has barely begun. Recession risk remains high. Many will panic - but YOU don't need to. In short, there's a simple way to receive near-guaranteed income - legally owed to you - from outside the stock market. The last time we saw similar market conditions, you could have seen 772% gains. Click here to learn more.
Forensic accountant who consults for U.S. Pentagon, FBI, and Marines says a surprising July 25 "twist" could make many Americans vastly wealthier... but also hand Joe Biden a landslide re-election win. Full story, including four steps you can take to protect your money, detailed here.
The Phillips Curve dates back to a 1958 paper published by economist A.W. Phillips. It focused on wage and employment data from the United Kingdom.
Based on this data, Phillips derived an "inverse" relationship between wages and employment. Economists later expanded "wages" to include general price levels ("inflation").
In other words, as unemployment increases, wages and inflation decrease. On the flip side, lower unemployment leads to higher wages and higher inflation. Take a look...
Today, the Federal Reserve is pushing for higher unemployment to get inflation under control. And many folks presume it will keep raising interest rates in an attempt to get inflation down to its target of 2%.
To get a clearer picture of the Phillips Curve, we need to consider more data...
Kevin Kliesen is an economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. He analyzed U.S. data from the 1950s and 1960s to confirm the relationship between unemployment and inflation.
I downloaded Kliesen's data from the St. Louis Fed's data portal. And I created the following scatterplot to interpret his analysis...
Look at the (approximate) trend line summarizing these data points. It starts at the upper left and ends near the lower right.
In other words... it's similar to the Phillips Curve.
You can see a gentle curve with the sharpest turn near the 2% level for the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") and the 4% level for unemployment.
It's not perfect. But the Phillips Curve supported this general pattern.
However, this idea cracked in the 1970s. That was a period of "stagflation" in the U.S. as high unemployment and high inflation happened at the same time.
The Phillips Curve suggests that stagflation can't happen because those two variables are inversely related. But as those of us who lived through it know... it did happen!
In the 1970s, the data points were all over the place. Hardly any of them touched the trend line.
Now, let's fast-forward 30 years later. Here's my scatterplot using data from 2000 to 2019...
You can clearly see limitations of the Phillips Curve in this chart. It's a mess...
The bottom portion captures the period around the 2008 financial crisis.
You might be able to make out a horizontal trend line centered at 2.5% to 3% on the CPI. But ultimately, if you're as unimpressed as I am, you're in good company...
In July 2019, Fed Chair Jerome Powell told Congress that the Phillips Curve theory is all but dead...
[It's] weaker and weaker and weaker to the point where it's a faint heartbeat.
The Phillips Curve is not what it used to be. And that breakdown has fueled a shift...
Economists are looking beyond traditional unemployment and inflation data. They're also analyzing the expectations tied to those variables.
That's what folks like Powell are using to frame today's monetary policy. In his own words...
[Because] inflation expectations are so settled... that's what we think drives inflation.
But it's not a simple task...
The Fed is still working to achieve its inflation goals. To do that, it needs to address both the causes of record inflation and general expectations about prices.
So we don't really need a deep recession or depression to cut inflation – unless we really want one.
Good investing,
Marc Gerstein
Market View
Major Indexes and Notable Sectors
# Hld: Bullish Neutral Bearish
Dow 30
-1.46%
5
21
4
S&P 500
-1.50%
73
315
109
Nasdaq
-0.47%
35
48
17
Small Caps
-2.61%
308
1062
518
Bonds
+1.50%
— According to the Chaikin Power Bar, Small Cap stocks and Large Cap stocks remain somewhat Bearish. Major indexes are mixed.
* * * *
Sector Tracker
Sector movement over the last 5 days
Information Technology
+5.66%
Communication
+5.26%
Utilities
+3.96%
Discretionary
+2.31%
Staples
+1.42%
Health Care
+1.38%
Real Estate
+0.36%
Industrials
-2.35%
Materials
-3.42%
Financial
-5.92%
Energy
-6.92%
* * * *
Industry Focus
Aerospace & Defense Services
12
18
3
Over the past 6 months, the Aerospace & Defense subsector (XAR) has outperformed the S&P 500 by +9.96%. Its Power Bar ratio, which measures future potential, is Very Strong, with more Bullish than Bearish stocks. It is currently ranked #5 of 21 subsectors and has moved down 1 slot over the past week.
Top Stocks
NPK
National Presto Indu
MOG.A
Moog Inc.
AIR
AAR Corp.
* * * *
Top Movers
Gainers
FDX
+7.97%
NEM
+5.22%
TFX
+1.56%
AKAM
+1.49%
EBAY
+1.47%
Losers
FRC
-32.80%
USB
-9.38%
ENPH
-8.68%
CMA
-8.44%
LNC
-8.19%
* * * *
Earnings Report
Reporting Today
Rating
Before Open
After Close
No earnings reporting today.
Earnings Surprises
No significant Earnings Surprises in the Russell 3000.
* * * *
You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to PowerFeed. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from PowerFeed, click here.
You're receiving this e-mail at diansastroxz.forex@blogger.com.
For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call +1 (877) 697-6783 (U.S.), 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. Eastern time or e-mail info@chaikinanalytics.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice.
Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Chaikin Analytics, LLC, does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors.
Chaikin Analytics forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Chaikin Analytics, LLC (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation.
This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.
Post a Comment
Post a Comment