| | | |
100% Tariffs on Swiss Gold?
First, don’t miss today’s Daily Chart Setup trade idea down lower in this newsletter.
Trump proposes 100% tariffs on Swiss gold. A tariff on gold like this might blow up the flow of money and cause a funding miss. What might the unintended consequences of this tariff be?
Come join me as we dive in and see what’s moving!
Plus, as always, we have stocks popping and dropping so come find out what is moving this morning as I look for stocks and do some live premarket analysis on SPX, SPY, NDX, QQQ, Russell, IWM and other stocks that are potential plays for the day.
— — —
Zero Dollars Down, Billions in Value Up — Apple’s Oval Office Magic Trick
Picture this…
You're watching the news and see President Trump in the Oval Office next to Apple CEO Tim Cook, announcing what sounds like a massive trade war escalation. Trump declares 100% tariffs on semiconductor and chip imports. If a chip costs $10 to import, it would now cost $20.
But companies that promise to build manufacturing in America get a free pass.
If you're a savvy investor, your first instinct should be to ask…
What's really going on here?
Because what we witnessed wasn't a policy announcement — it was political theater, with Apple playing the starring role.
Apple announced a "fresh" $100 billion investment in the U.S., adding to a previously pledged $500 billion over four years — a $600 billion total. Sounds massive, right?
But Apple has only spent $43 billion in capital expenditures over the past four years. They've never even generated $100 billion in net income in their best year. So where is this $600 billion coming from?
The answer is creative accounting. Apple is bundling everything — cost of goods sold, selling and administrative expenses, capital expenditures, stock buybacks, and probably their office coffee budget — into one impressive-sounding number.
It's like me promising to spend $50,000 on my house this year by including mortgage payments, utility bills, groceries and the occasional pizza delivery.
Technically true, but hardly a “new” investment.
The moment this announcement hit, Apple's stock price surged, adding billions in market value. The company got the benefits of a major policy win without committing to spend a single additional dollar.
Meanwhile, Tim Cook had been working the political system — attending Trump's inauguration, donating to the inaugural committee, and visiting Mar-a-Lago.
Behind the Curtain
Trump hit India — where most iPhones sold in America are manufactured — with 50% tariffs. Vietnam, where Apple makes iPads and MacBooks, got 20%. So while Apple gets headlines for avoiding tariffs through promises, they're getting hammered on existing production.
This fits a broader pattern investors should recognize. Since Trump's election, CEOs have made pilgrimages to Mar-a-Lago and the White House, announcing hundreds of billions in "new" investments.
But Bloomberg's analysis revealed most were already planned or simply repackaged spending trends with bigger numbers.
What It Means for Investors
The real question is enforceability. Trump's exemption policy says: "Promise to build in America, and you're exempt." But what if companies don’t follow through?
The policy is so vague it’s practically unenforceable. Even Apple’s CEO admitted final iPhone assembly "will be elsewhere for a while." Yet Trump seemed satisfied.
What does this mean for your strategy? Be skeptical of stock moves based on announcements. The market is rewarding promises, not fundamentals or real capital allocation.
And companies getting hit by the tariffs are facing real cost pressures that impact margins and competitiveness.
The semiconductor sector is especially exposed. While Apple gets exemptions through political maneuvering, smaller companies without the same lobbying power will face the full brunt. This gives connected firms an advantage unrelated to business performance or innovation.
The bottom line? This is a masterclass in modern corporate-political relationships. Apple spent zero additional dollars but gained billions by playing the game. The real economic impact will fall on companies and consumers who don't have Tim Cook's phone number.
As investors, our job is to look past the headlines and focus on real business impacts. Which companies are changing capital allocation? Which are facing real tariff costs? And which are just good at making promises that sound impressive in press releases?
The market might reward political theater short term, but long-term returns come from companies that execute on real strategies — not headline-grabbing announcements in the Oval Office.
Now be sure to join me live at 9:15 a.m. ET for “Morning Monster,” my market-open livestream on YouTube!
| | | | |
|
|
Post a Comment
Post a Comment