|
Bill Gates, Climate Heretic! |
|
|
|
Dear Reader, |
Mr. Bill Gates, 2021: |
In a typical year the world emits over 51 billion tons of greenhouse gases, and as we keep doing that, the consequences for human life will be catastrophic… |
|
|
Setting a goal to only reduce our emissions — but not eliminate them — won't do it… |
|
|
To stop the warming and avoid the worst effects of climate change — and these effects will be very bad — humans need to stop adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere… |
|
|
If nothing else changes, the world will keep producing greenhouse gases, climate change will keep getting worse, and the impact on humans will in all likelihood be catastrophic. |
|
|
The identical Bill Gates, Oct. 2025: |
There's a doomsday view of climate change that goes like this: |
|
|
In a few decades, cataclysmic climate change will decimate civilization. The evidence is all around us — just look at all the heat waves and storms caused by rising global temperatures. Nothing matters more than limiting the rise in temperature. |
Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong. Although climate change will have serious consequences — particularly for people in the poorest countries — it will not lead to humanity's demise. People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future. |
|
|
Climate Denier! |
Thus Mr. Gates newly sorts into the infamous category of "climate denier." |
And so he joins the heretics and apostates who reject the puritanical faith of climate catastrophism. |
He now embraces the more tolerant and ecumenical faith of climate adaptation, facilitated by technological innovation. |
Here President Trump celebrates the fellow's road to Damascus conversion: |
"I (WE!) just won the War on the Climate Change Hoax. Bill Gates has finally admitted that he was completely WRONG on the issue. It took courage to do so, and for that we are all grateful. MAGA!!!" |
|
|
Mr. Gates' heresy certainly represents a blow to the catastrophist church. |
Predictably, he has already fallen under its excommunication. |
And he must endure all punishments following therefrom. |
| |
I warned you about Nvidia. Now I'm warning you about this.
| Now, I've built something new for the AI boom. A system with the potential for wins up to 138 times bigger than Nvidia. | This isn't another stock tip. It's a strategic weapon. | Full details are coming soon. Pay attention, or you'll be kicking yourself again. |
| | |
|
Why the Conversion? |
Of course Mr. Gates himself formerly preached the fire and brimstone "doomsday view of climate change" he now denounces. |
What has changed? |
Has he simply turned his coat in the manner of a Benedict Arnold? Has he chanced upon fresh scientific literature that harpoons catastrophist theories? Has he yielded to the seductive charms of an oil magnate's beautiful daughter? |
I do not know. |
Perhaps — I hazard — it is because the fellow is an artificial intelligence evangelist. |
And he understands that "green" wind and solar energies are simply inadequate to artificial intelligence's gluttonous energetic requirements. |
Only demon fossil fuels, combined perhaps with nuclear power, can energize artificial intelligence… for the near future at least. |
The Limits of Green Energy |
Mr. Mark Mills co-directs Northwestern University's Institute on Manufacturing Science and Innovation. |
From whom: |
All sources of energy have limits that can't be exceeded. The maximum rate at which the sun's photons can be converted to electrons is about 33%. Our best solar technology is at 26% efficiency. For wind, the maximum capture is 60%. Our best machines are at 45%. So we're pretty close to wind and solar limits. Despite big claims about big gains coming, there just aren't any possible. |
|
|
If this fellow is correct — my scientific advisors inform me he is — wind and solar energy are vastly inadequate to energy needs. |
And they will likely remain inadequate to energy needs through the end of the chapter. |
The physics, after all, is the physics. |
And the physics places harsh constraints upon wind and solar energies. |
They cannot sustain artificial intelligence. But to proceed… |
Science Is Never "Settled" |
Climate catastrophists claim their faith is anchored in "settled science." |
Yet science — contrary to the claims of the Dr. Faucis of this world — is never "settled." |
Scientific theory may be validated by experimentation. The theory of gravity, for example, is a highly compelling theory. |
To my admittedly limited knowledge, it has seen off every challenge. |
Yet scientific theory can never be proven. |
Against every scientific theory flaws relentlessly conspire. They merely await their chance. |
One lone flaw can render invalid an entire theory. |
The scientist never truly knows. He can merely theorize |
Thus science — authentic science — is the avowed enemy of belief. |
Politicized science… political science… is the bedfellow of belief. |
Wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME |
Catastrophists argue that Earth is the hottest in 100,000 years. |
Assume for the moment that the claim proves valid. Yet why was Earth this hot 100,000 years ago? |
Where was the internal-combustion engine? It was nowhere in evidence. |
And if warming yields additional warming… which yields additional warming… which yields additional warming… until Earth cooks… as the catastrophists believe… how did Earth ever cool? |
I request a square answer. |
The catastrophists warn us nonetheless that we will roast if emissions continue. |
The identical individuals have been yelling wolf for years and years and years. |
Geophysicist Mr. Allan MacRae: |
By the end of 2020, the climate doomsters were proved wrong in their scary climate predictions 48 times. At 50-50 odds for each prediction, that is like flipping a coin 48 times and losing every time! The probability of that being mere random stupidity is one in 281 trillion!… |
|
|
The global warming alarmists have a perfect NEGATIVE predictive track record — they have been 100% wrong about every scary climate prediction — so nobody should continue to believe them. |
|
|
I am with this fellow — nobody should continue to believe the catastrophists. |
One in 281 trillion odds is adequate evidence for me. |
Perhaps Mr. Gates is at last persuaded. |
Regards, |
Brian Maher |
for Freedom Financial News |
P.S. Today we'd like to alert you to "Rich Dad" Robert Kiyosaki's hot New Moneymaker. |
What is that? We can't provide all the details today. |
But what we can say is that it's an AI-driven profit breakthrough that nails stock market wins up to 138 times bigger than Nvidia — with a data-proven accuracy potential of over 86%. |
138 times bigger than Nvidia! Can that really be true? |
We'll have all the details this coming Monday, so be sure to check in then. |
Post a Comment
Post a Comment